Do you have a lot of money in European Banks? I hope so.

No he hasn't. He is waiting for you to demonstrate how its done.

Just remember: no more Piers means no more thread for you to share your hostilities. Do you have a backup scapegoat for your frustrations?

Did Piers kill himself yet?

Totally irrelevant to this thread, and nonetheless, appropriate

i've no idea. Nor do I care. But do you ever wonder what your life would be like if you'd had enough oxygen at birth? Now return to your wankers paradise and continue to cry yourself to sleep with those uncomfortable childhood memories.

Why do I suspect that you are both at times.

If you read more than three lines on biofind, you are a wanker. If you write more than three lines, you are a wanker wrapped in an imbecile wrapped in a Christian.

You Bastard Neil!

Still here searching for the missing link.

Here's the link you requested:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gbajf_rHzys

Also explore, "The Young Ones"....

True that....

It's not unfair to characterize the right wing as haters and intolerant racists. That's pretty close to the mark usually.
Perhaps a few exceptions.

Thank you. Just so you know, there is a lot about the left I don't like either. It's not the same kind of thing because, in general, the extreme left isn't acting out of anger and hatred. Clearly, some of the excesses of the anti-war movement during Viet Nam arose from anger, hatred, and frustration. The problem I tend to have with the extreme left is that too much of what they want to do just isn't realistic. Too much seems to be based on an erroneous notion that if we solve all of man's problems and make everyone happy, the people will only have a good side and there will never again be people who have a bad, evil, nasty, angry side and that would never happen.

I would strongly prefer to have a discussion of issues than a public that just elects people and doesn't care at all about the issues. My biggest problem with the right wing posters here is their hostility and seeming inability to discuss things rationally and calmly and based on some reasonable amount of facts and not re-written history. I've made the plea several times to just tone it down and let's discuss things civilly. It just never happens.

And after long observation of the extreme right wing posts, I am pretty much convinced that they are just a repetition of one or another of the many right wing talking heads. Once they post their latest and greatest, they have an uncanny ability not to be able to respond to comments on their post. In a few cases, I've actually seen cut and paste from other sites. I also suspect that part of their frustration is that they really can't defend their position on their own because the only thing the know is what they hear daily from the right wing gurus. That's why I sometimes use the word 'pathetic' to describe some of the posters here. I have also noticed that there is rarely any comment from people who are conservative, but not reactionary .. people who want to move ahead slowly and cautiously rather than move backwards. The latter are really reactionaries and right now they are dominating the Republican party.

So part of what I do here is to criticize and part to mock some of the really silly or nasty stuff and hopefully get people interested in learning some history, learning to analyze on their own rather than being robotic missionaries, and to continue to try to create an adult, rational conversation rather than a shouting match.

I agree with the Stealer's Wheel guy. He is reasonable and correct.

I have no patience for right-wing, Republican haters who demonize the poor and criminalize homelessness. We'll all be homeless soon enough.

"You can't really understand the British sensibilities if you haven't seen Cliff Richard's "Summer Holiday"."

So let me get this straight. All that is needed to understand the Brits is to watch one movie? I never knew that Brits had such a good sense of humour or think of themselves in such a shallow manner. Rather than watching a movie, why not invite people to Britain to see and interact with Brits directly, up close and personal and in real life? If you want to learn about a society or culture, you must actually walk among them. At best, your movie would be a single snapshot and represent the views of its creator.

Do you think you can understand America by watching what comes out of Hollywood? C'mon now ... give me a break !!

Sorry if it bothers you if I respond in kind to the nasty comments from the right. Equating Morgan and Hitler shows far more anger and hatred than any of my cynical, and hopefully at times, humourous, remarks. If you take everything I say seriously, you are even more frustrated and desparate than I imagined.

At least when I post something negative, I try to indicate it is meant humourously and to poke fun at some of the more outlandish posts here. The only thing I'm promoting here is common sense and the exposure of those who make wild unsubstantiatd assertions that they cannot back up with any data or facts. As for my use of the word 'stupid', I refer to statements by the Republican Governor of Louisiana, Bobby Jindal.

It's a Stealer's Wheel thing: Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, here I am, stuck in the middle, surrounded by a bunch of special breed of emotional, know nothing politico wannabes.

Chill dude. This thread is a complete joke no matter how you look at it or which side you are on. It's basically all emotion with virtually zero substance.

You should take the 16th poster's suggestion to heart.
You can't really understand the British sensibilities if you haven't seen Cliff Richard's "Summer Holiday". That pretty much encapsulates the hopes and dreams of the citizens of Great Britain. Watch the film, then come back to discuss.

Hey Angry Guy:

Just cool your jets. Your fellow Biofinders are not your enemy. You don't need to insult us. Just contribute without name-calling. It'll be much more palatable for your audience.

NEWSFLASH:

Michael Moore has just announced plan for his latest movie which will be based on the contents of this thread. The title of the new movie (obviously) will be 'Sicko II'.

The above is no less credible than most of the posts here. The attempt at a joke is meant to trivialize this entire thread and to irritate those who shudder at the mere mention of Michael Moore's name. What's the matter? Don't you like that stupid ugly baseball cap he always wears??? Personally, I think the cap is un-American and should be the subject of a Congressional investigate. I'm sure Michelle Bachmann would love to take up this cause. She's running out of gas on her 'repeal Obamacare' mania and even being criticized by some of the FOX personalities.

How pathetic you all are. Is this the best you can do with your lives? Comparing Piers to Hitler is certainly consistent with right wing tactics and is totally looney. Piers is basically an insignificant pompous television entertainment personality and you waste your time talking about him. Is this really the best you can do for your 'cause'? Do you really thing that Piers' presence in America or on TV is a threat? If so, you really need to get a life.

PATHETIC
FRUSTRATED
POLITICALLY IMPOTENT
FRUSTRATED

There can only be one logical goal for the attackers on this thread (and you're gonna love this one). By continually showing the rest of the world how stupid American are, you will probably convince potential immigrants to stay away, much as they would avoid a leper colony. Did I finally see through your smoke screen?

I used to think Bill O'Reilly was the worst, but now I know Piers MOrgan is much worse than Bill O'Reilly. Really bad hate mogering.

If Hitler had had Facebook and Twitter, he would be the same as Piers Morgan. Identical. It's just ability to reach people en masse with his message of hate and intolerance. Piers hates America but he won't leave.

I agree: Piers Morgan is as bad as Hitler. Maybe worse.

Morgan is identical to Hitler in that he spews hate-speech and intolerance and blames everyone else for society's problems.
Piers Morgan is Hitler. He is a propaganda machine.

Limey's hate Piers. They don't want him back.

Piers promised to deport himself.

He broke his promise to the American People.

Why all the obsession with Piers at all? This thread just gives him more visibility, more attention, and mostly, more credibility. If Piers was all the things claimed here, he wouldn't have a job at all. The constant attacks here just make Piers more important. In contrast, ignoring public figure like Piers is the worst punishment.

And, fyi, I have no need to quarrel with Piers' politics because I believe in freedom of speech. I also don't particularly like Piers' style which I find pompous and self centered to an extent that it interferes with his interview. Simply being pompous is NOT a crime. If it were, most of the people who post on this thread would be in jail, arguing it out face to face.

As far as the Hitler comparison, it is completely bogus. Piers is a commentator who's views you may not like. He is not forming his own private army, not trying to strong arm citizens during elections, and does not even appear to have much interest in becoming a public servant. I am not sure that anyone here can present a cogent, logical and factual example of how words alone have been destructive to a country. There are far greater threats to America than Piers and by focusing your energy on Piers, you only raise his importance and trivialize real problems that need attention.

I just wonder why the right wing always seems to need a villian or scapegoat to attack. Why can't they just present their own agenda without all the fearmongering? They have been doing it for almost 100 years now and I can't really think of a single fear thing that has actually happened, not from the red scare of the 1920s, not from the Communist menace thing with HUAC and Sen. McCarthy, and not even from every Muslim on earth. Is the right wing just a bunch of chicken littles with no real agenda other than to make the rich richer and the poor poorer? When will they ever realize that their messages of fear and hate don't work in America?

I agree with the third caller. This is nothing but hate-speak.

Sometimes this is appropriate, like if Hitler started a thread on Biofind with his attitude towards the Jews.
That would be flagged.
You need to flag that sort of hate speech.

However, Piers promised to deport himself and he broke his promise.
He is a liar and a loser.

I just love how this thread demonstrates the extreme frustration and desparation of the right wing. Reading their posts is like watching Custer at the Battle of Little Big Horn. (And the good guys won that one too).

Desparate
Frustrated
Pathetic
Frustrated

Ok, this is the last time I ask you guys. No more penguins.

How much more fuel does the right wing have to turn the American public towards the liberals? It is so much fun to watch them destroy themselves in their blind know-nothing rage.

What fools be these cwazy wight wing wackos.

duh women shouldn't own guns duh lay back and enjoy it duh think of Barry

"Find Jesus, asswipes. "

You really know how to charm people and attract them to your cause, don't you. I bet Jesus never used your foulmouthed approach to sell his message.

How sad that the legitimate right has vanished and just left a bunch of angry, nasty, mean-spirited old white men to preach their message of hate. There is no legitmate way that these nut jobs can claim to be followers of Jesus .... or any other major religion in the world since most are founded on the concepts of love, respect, and honour of others. You possess all but three of these traits.

You are all WAY off course. Find Jesus, asswipes.

I'd be willing to guess that more than half of you have never even seen the classic coming-of-age story on film, entitled "Summer Holiday", starring Fiscal Cliff Richard.

"Barack Obama is doing profound and long-lasting damage to the United States. He will continue to do so until people finally recognize who the real Obama is"....

Guess what the economy would look like with Paul Ryan's clowns hacking it apart........That nutjob is pure evil in the body of a Muppet Character.

"George W. Bush wouldn't eat a dog!"

Of course not. That would be self-cannibalism.

It is always dark for those who refuse to open their eyes to reality and who can only blindly and unthinkingly let their minds be infused by the rantings of others.

There seems to be alot of that going around on the right. I guess when you don't have the ability to develop your own independent views or to answer comments about the views you express, it is pretty dark ... and lonely. With no real depth to your ideas, it is little wonder that the American people aren't buying what you're trying to sell. Instead of reading and parroting the right wing talking heads, try looking at some of the polls that show how few accept your positions. No, it's not the messenger as the Republicans are saying; it's the message as well. It isn't so bad that a few Republicans run around talking about various kinds of rape (natural rape, legitmate rape, using an aspirin between a woman's legs as birth control, talking about how the female body has its own ways to prevent pregnancy in the case of rape, etc.) There will always be kooks around like that. The real problem with Republicans is that the so-called rational ones won't dissociate themselves from the kooks. You are not selling your ideas becuase they are out of date and out of touch with today's reality.

George W. Bush wouldn't eat a dog!

Ron Ross writes for The American Spectator. One look at their home page will tell you they are an extreme right wing group. Just a quick look at the titles of some of their articles suggests this is a group of almost psychopathic paranoids. Each article title seems to be crazier than the others. Why not just save the time and send us to all of your right wing sites so at least we know who's writing your material.

I always said you have no ideas or knowledge of your own. Thank you for proving my point. So is Mr. Ross you sole 'brain' or do you have other right wingers you shill for?

It's getting dark, mother.

Jeez. Now you can't even speak for yourself. You are reduced to cutting and pasting the words of others. Your talking head simply doesn't get the concept of democracy. When you lose, you lose. You don't just say that you are right and you should get your way after losing two elections in a row. And you don't justify yourself by saying you are right and the American people are wrong. I thought you were against elitism.

Go out and get a brain for yourself. It doesn't pay to discuss things with a mindless surrogate who can't think and do for himself.

The Deceiver in Chief- As in Satan, the Great Deceiver.

f he loved his country he wouldn’t be wanting to “fundamentally transform” it.
By Ron Ross
3.20.13

Barack Obama’s most dangerous talent is his ability to make people believe he’s something he’s not. He is not recognized for whom and what he is, especially the fact that he does not like the country he’s governing. He is effective because he has successfully hidden his true objectives. He has convinced his followers that he has their interests at heart, that he cares about them and wants to help them. The key ingredient in his power lies in his ability to deceive. People do not want to believe that he does not like the country. Our country is in collective state of denial.

Barack Obama is arrogant, intolerant, mean, dishonest, vengeful, and ruthless. He does not wish us well. He is considered by many of his supporters to be a savior. In fact, he’s a destroyer. Is that an unfair indictment? Consider the evidence.

The economy is operating far below its potential. Is he doing anything to discover why? Millions of people are unable to find jobs. Does he seem concerned? He has an abysmal ignorance of how a market economy actually works. He doesn’t show the slightest curiosity about the causes of our economic distress.

He doesn’t know what he’s doing and he doesn’t care that he doesn’t know. He’s so incredibility arrogant, he doesn’t think he even needs to know. The very fact that he thought he was qualified to fill the most important office in the world demonstrates his profound arrogance.

Obama sees no difference between his opinions and the truth. He assumes whatever he says is true simply by the act of saying it. He claims to have proposed $3.9 trillion in budget cuts but no one can explain what he’s referring to. He doesn’t seem to recognize that there is such a thing as the truth.

The reason he has to use a teleprompter is to keep himself from expressing what he really thinks. Honesty or sincerity would lead to his undoing.

Obama despises his political opponents. He shows no interest in compromise or negotiation and is not interested in debating or persuading. He wishes the Republican Party did not exist. He resents constitutional checks and balances. When he said recently, “I am not a dictator,” he was in fact whining. He wishes he were a dictator or emperor.

Whenever he faces a choice between his interests and the country’s interests, he always chooses his own. He is indifferent to the country’s pain. In fact, he seems to relish seeing it happen. He wants the sequester to cause as much pain as possible. He wants to maximize, not minimize, the country’s pain.

We have a president who has a profound conflict of interest with the country he’s leading. Economic growth is by far the most effective solution to many of our problems. But economic growth reduces the need for a large number of government programs — food stamps, housing subsidies, and unemployment compensation, for example. He wants to pile on ever more growth-killing regulations and taxes. Economic growth is detrimental to his policy objectives. He only wants to redistribute wealth, not create it.

He has stated that his desire is to “fundamentally transform” America. Obviously he does not approve of what America is and has been in the past. If you love your wife you do not want to “fundamentally transform” her. If you do want to, then you don’t love her. In his opinion, the birth of our country wasn’t a blessing, it was a kind of original sin. The Obama White House is comprised of people who see America in the same way.

He does not like our history, our traditions, and a large segment of the population — Republicans, gun owners, “millionaires and billionaires,” for example. He told his supporters in the 2012 election that “voting is the best revenge.” He has pitted citizen against citizen.

Can it be denied that he has fomented class warfare? Is class warfare a good thing? Why has he done this? He has done so in order to serve his own selfish ends. Class warfare is good for Obama and his Democrat allies, but it’s bad for the country. His all-consuming policy objective is to expand the size and scope of government in everyone’s lives. The corollary is the diminishment of the individual.

He has indicted entire groups of people (millionaires and billionaires, for example), virtually all of whom are honest, law-abiding, productive members of society — no trial, no evidence, just a verdict. They are found guilty simply because they have wealth. Financial success used to be admired, now it is ridiculed and demeaned. His heart is filled with malice, not generosity or gratitude. He is fomenting hatred and envy. Most people want to believe that he is basically a nice person. He is not.

Republican senators and congressmen either do not see the real Obama or they do but don’t want to go public with their beliefs. They need strategies based on who he is, not who he ought to be.

America has made a grievous error in electing and then reelecting a leader who hates the country he’s leading. Everyone who loves the U.S. — its history, traditions, and a free-market, voluntary exchange economy — is profoundly disheartened by what’s going on before their eyes.

Barack Obama is doing profound and long-lasting damage to the United States. He will continue to do so until people finally recognize who the real Obama is.

Ron Ross Ph.D. is an economist who lives in Arcata, California. He is the author of The Unbeatable Market. Reach him at rossecon@gmail.com.

"To be fair, that is the purpose of every single thread on this site."

Perhaps, but this particular thread appears to be way above average. It attracts a more virulent and obscene form of right winger. If they are really invading other threads it's a pretty sad commentary on how desparate they've become. It's almost to the point where one considers the word 'pity'.

Piers Morgan is praying for dead kids.

The disgraced tabloid editor was brought in to handle celebrity interviews after everyone at CNN assumed that Larry King had died. King had not actually died and no one wanted to watch a doughy British man interview minor celebs on CNN.

Then Piers Morgan discovered dead kids. For weeks he yelled about assault rifles and did everything but go out to the Newtown cemetery with a shovel. And then the news rolled on and no one is watching Piers Morgan.

True that...

The February 28th episode of Piers Morgan Tonight, which featured an exclusive interview with Gus Searcy, the mentor of Jodi Arias suffered a yearly low in the key 25-54 demographic with only 87,000 viewers. The show is down 27% in total viewers and 38% in the demo from its debut in Jan. 17th, 2011.

Why does America hate freedom so much that they stop viewing Piers Morgan?

PM = Freedom

I'd be willing to guess that more than half of you have never even seen the classic coming-of-age story on film, entitled "Summer Holiday", starring Fiscal Cliff Richard.

Without that background, you are uninformed and your opinions are meaningless. You need the backstory; you don't know what is going on - AT ALL.....

"The sole purpose of this thread appears to be to allow a few people to compete to see who can make the most outragegous right wing comments."

To be fair, that is the purpose of every single thread on this site.

Is that you, Mr. Serling?

Piers is dreamy! He reminds me of an upper classman in my public school days. (sigh)

Don't tell my wife.

-A Brit

One thing you have all very conveniently forgotten:

Piers Morgan is a very spiritual and religious man.
Ergo, just like Mitt he tithes his 10%, but pays no more than he has to in taxes (e.g., 12% overall).
He gives of himself and his time because he cares about the children.
He's the only Brit who gives a hoot about automatic weapons used in gun violence against small children.
He stands alone in this. Everyone else in the world wants more guns; he wants fewer guns.
Piers Morgan is a very brave and courageous man.
You should respect him, and not just laugh at him.

Two simple facts about Obamacare.

1. It is here to stay for the foreseeable future. In order to repeal it, it will take Republicans winning the White House, maintaining control of the House, AND obtaining a minimum of 60 seats in the Senate. That is not likely to happen soon.

2. By the time that repeal becomes a political reality, Obamacare will have been in full force for several years. Remember it won't come into full effect until next year. After that, one of two things will happen. Either the predictions that it will be terrible will come true and pressure will come from the public to either repeal it or fix the parts that are broke OR they will come to love it in which case repeal will be as impossible as repealing social security or medicare is today.

It matters no whether you like Obamacare or hate it or are indifferent, the above is fairly certain. A whatever is said about it here is of vitually no consequence.

There, I did it. I admitted to being a participant in an exercise in futility. (However, I continue because there are a few positive things in it for me).